• Title of article

    Reply to discussion of “Tropospheric ozone variability over the Iberian Peninsula Atmospheric Environment” by Kulkarni et al. (2011)

  • Author/Authors

    Kulkarni، نويسنده , , Pavan S. and Bortoli، نويسنده , , D. and Salgado، نويسنده , , R. and Antَn، نويسنده , , M. and Costa، نويسنده , , M.J. and Silva، نويسنده , , A.M.، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2011
  • Pages
    3
  • From page
    2600
  • To page
    2602
  • Abstract
    In the discussion paper on our article (Kulkarni et al., 2011), de Laat has criticized TOR methodology and TOR data and thus questioned the validity of the findings. He has also pointed out the fact that the authors may have used the OMI/MLS data. In this reply to the discussion, the clarifications and references given herewith endeavour to undoubtedly answer the questions posed by de Laat on TOR methodology and on TOR data and thus proving that the findings of Kulkarni et al. (2011) are scientifically justified and therefore entirely valid. Furthermore, reasons were presented to justify the non use of the OMI/MLS data.
  • Keywords
    TOR methodology , TOR data
  • Journal title
    Atmospheric Environment
  • Serial Year
    2011
  • Journal title
    Atmospheric Environment
  • Record number

    2237611