Author/Authors :
Gao، نويسنده , , Bo and Wang، نويسنده , , Xin-Ming and Zhao، نويسنده , , Xiu-Ying and Ding، نويسنده , , Xiang and Fu، نويسنده , , Xiaoxin and Zhang، نويسنده , , Yan-Li and He، نويسنده , , Quan-Fu and Zhang، نويسنده , , Zhou and Liu، نويسنده , , Teng-Yu and Huang، نويسنده , , Zou-Zhao and Chen، نويسنده , , Lai-Guo and Peng، نويسنده , , Yan and Guo، نويسنده , , Hai، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
24-h PM2.5 samples were simultaneously collected at six sites in a subtropical city of South China during November–December, 2009. Particle-phase concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organic tracers such as hopanes for vehicular emissions (VE), levoglucosan for biomass burning (BB) and picene for coal combustion (CC) were determined. Meanwhile, their gas-phase concentrations were calculated from gas/particle (G/P) partitioning theory using the particle-phase concentrations. The 4 ring PAHs (fluoranthene to chrysene) had lower particle-phase fractions (10%–79%) than other species. Estimated BaPeq and lifetime cancer risk for particle-only (P-only) vs gas + particle (G + P) data sets showed similar values, indicating PAHs with 5–7 rings dominated the carcinogenicity of PAHs. Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) was applied on both P-only and G + P data sets to estimate the source contributions to PAHs and their toxicity. Three common sources were identified: VE, BB and CC, with CC as the most significant source for both particulate (58%) and total (G + P, 40%) PAHs. While CC exhibited consistent contributions to BaPeq for P-only (66%) vs G + P (62%) solutions, VE and BB contributions were under- and overestimated by 68% and 47%, respectively by the P-only solution, as compared to the G + P solution. The results provide an insight on the impact of G/P partitioning on the source apportionment of PAHs and their toxicity.
Keywords :
TOXICITY , Partitioning , PAHS , PM2.5 , source apportionment