Title of article
How equivalent are the action execution, imagery, and observation of intransitive movements? Revisiting the concept of somatotopy during action simulation
Author/Authors
Lorey، نويسنده , , Britta and Naumann، نويسنده , , Tim and Pilgramm، نويسنده , , Sebastian and Petermann، نويسنده , , Carmen and Bischoff، نويسنده , , Matthias and Zentgraf، نويسنده , , Karen and Stark، نويسنده , , Rudolf and Vaitl، نويسنده , , Dieter and Munzert، نويسنده , , Jِrn، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2013
Pages
12
From page
139
To page
150
Abstract
Jeannerod (2001) hypothesized that action execution, imagery, and observation are functionally equivalent. This led to the major prediction that these motor states are based on the same action-specific and even effector-specific motor representations. The present study examined whether hand and foot movements are represented in a somatotopic manner during action execution, imagery, and action observation.
periment contained ten conditions: three execution conditions, three imagery conditions, three observation conditions, and one baseline condition. In the nine experimental conditions, participants had to execute, observe, or imagine right-hand extension/flexion movements or right-foot extension/flexion movements. The fMRI results showed a somatotopic organization within the contralateral premotor and primary motor cortex during motor imagery and motor execution. However, there was no clear somatotopic organization of action observation in the given regions of interest within the contralateral hemisphere, although observation of these movements activated these areas significantly.
Keywords
Motor simulation , FMRI , Action observation , Somatotopic mapping , Motor imagery
Journal title
Brain and Cognition
Serial Year
2013
Journal title
Brain and Cognition
Record number
2250653
Link To Document