Title of article
Intercalibration of 40Ar39Ar dating standards
Author/Authors
Baksi، نويسنده , , Ajoy K. and Archibald، نويسنده , , D.A. and Farrar، نويسنده , , Edward، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages
18
From page
307
To page
324
Abstract
A number of standards used for KAr and 40Ar39Ar dating have been intercalibrated. Multiple splits (∼ 15–40 mg each) of MMhb-1, SB-3 Biotite, LP-6 Biotite 40–60#, GA1550 Biotite, Fish Canyon Tuff-3 Biotite, Taylor Creek Rhyolite Sanidine, Bern 4 Muscovite, Bern 4 Biotite and Pennsylvania State University Orthoclase-1A were irradiated in capsules, fused and analyzed. In replicate analyses, most of these standards proved to be homogeneous in 40Ar★39ArK ratio (age) K, Ca, and 36Ar contents. MMhb-1 is inhomogeneous in age at the ∼ 15-mg level, indicating it is unsuitable for use as an interlaboratory standard using material taken straight from the bottle; the orthoclase sample is also inhomogeneous at the ∼ 30-mg level. Quoted relative to an age of 162.9 Ma for the SB-3 Biotite standard, total fusion ages are:
iotite 40–60# = 128.1 Ma; GA1550 Biotite = 97.8 Ma; Fish Canyon Tuff-3 Biotite = 27.95 Ma; Taylor Creek Rhyolite Sanidine = 28.0 Ma; Bern 4 Muscovite = 18.51 Ma; Bern 4 Biotite = 17.21 Ma. These ages are in good agreement with the (absolute) KAr ages of these minerals. Different preparations of biotite and sanidine standards from a welded tuff such as the Fish Canyon Tuff may not be of identical ages.
on submilligram splits reveals that SB-3 Biotite, GA1550 Biotite, Fish Canyon Tuff-3 Biotite and Taylor Creek Rhyolite Sanidine are suitable for use as monitors in laser work; the sanidine specimen appears to be the most suitable for use as the primary monitor for 40Ar39Ar dating.
Journal title
Chemical Geology
Serial Year
1996
Journal title
Chemical Geology
Record number
2255343
Link To Document