Title of article
Advanced methods of flux identification for clarifier–thickener simulation models
Author/Authors
Betancourt، نويسنده , , Fernando and Bürger، نويسنده , , Raimund and Diehl، نويسنده , , Stefan and Mejيas، نويسنده , , Camilo، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages
14
From page
2
To page
15
Abstract
Mathematical models for the simulation of batch settling and continuous clarifier–thickeners can usually be expressed as a convection–diffusion partial differential equation (PDE). Reliable numerical methods require that the nonlinear flux function of this PDE has been identified for a given material. This contribution summarizes, and applies to experimental data, a recent approach [Bürger, R., Diehl, S., 2013. Inverse Problems 29, 045008] for the flux identification in the case of a suspension that shows no compressive behavior.
perimental Kynch test and the Diehl test, which are based on an initially homogenous suspension either filling the whole settling column or being initially located above clear liquid, respectively, provide data points that represent a convex and concave, respectively, suspension-supernate interface. A provably convex (concave) smooth approximation of this interface is obtained by solving a constrained least-squares minimization problem. The interface-approximating function can be converted uniquely into an explicit formula for a convex (concave) part of the flux function.
Keywords
Mathematical model , Batch sedimentation , Solid–liquid separation , Thickener simulation , Flux identification
Journal title
Minerals Engineering
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
Minerals Engineering
Record number
2277527
Link To Document