• Title of article

    Advanced methods of flux identification for clarifier–thickener simulation models

  • Author/Authors

    Betancourt، نويسنده , , Fernando and Bürger، نويسنده , , Raimund and Diehl، نويسنده , , Stefan and Mejيas، نويسنده , , Camilo، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
  • Pages
    14
  • From page
    2
  • To page
    15
  • Abstract
    Mathematical models for the simulation of batch settling and continuous clarifier–thickeners can usually be expressed as a convection–diffusion partial differential equation (PDE). Reliable numerical methods require that the nonlinear flux function of this PDE has been identified for a given material. This contribution summarizes, and applies to experimental data, a recent approach [Bürger, R., Diehl, S., 2013. Inverse Problems 29, 045008] for the flux identification in the case of a suspension that shows no compressive behavior. perimental Kynch test and the Diehl test, which are based on an initially homogenous suspension either filling the whole settling column or being initially located above clear liquid, respectively, provide data points that represent a convex and concave, respectively, suspension-supernate interface. A provably convex (concave) smooth approximation of this interface is obtained by solving a constrained least-squares minimization problem. The interface-approximating function can be converted uniquely into an explicit formula for a convex (concave) part of the flux function.
  • Keywords
    Mathematical model , Batch sedimentation , Solid–liquid separation , Thickener simulation , Flux identification
  • Journal title
    Minerals Engineering
  • Serial Year
    2014
  • Journal title
    Minerals Engineering
  • Record number

    2277527