Title of article
An argument for probabilistic coastal hazard assessment: Retrospective examination of practice in New South Wales, Australia
Author/Authors
Wainwright، نويسنده , , D.J. and Ranasinghe، نويسنده , , Jurgen R. and Callaghan، نويسنده , , D.P. and Woodroffe، نويسنده , , C.D. and Cowell، نويسنده , , P.J. and Rogers، نويسنده , , K.، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2014
Pages
9
From page
147
To page
155
Abstract
Determination of coastal hazard lines is a key task for coastal engineers worldwide. While current practice differs from country to country and even within countries, in many coastal hazard assessments three main components of coastline recession are taken into account: episodic recession due to storm erosion, long term recession due to an imbalance in sediment transport, and recession due to sea-level rise. In Australia, the state of New South Wales has a well-established procedure for the definition of coastal hazards that has evolved since the 1970ʹs. Accepted practice in NSW is intentionally conservative, due to uncertainties and a limited understanding of physical processes. This article (i) provides an historical perspective on the development of the established methodology; (ii) discusses the various components of coastal hazard considered, and (iii) examines the way in which these components can be combined. Suggestions are subsequently provided for a way forward that better suits emerging risk-based coastal management/planning frameworks. The article also considers the advantages and practicalities associated with assigning numerical probabilities to hazard lines as part of risk-based coastal management.
Journal title
Ocean and Coastal Management
Serial Year
2014
Journal title
Ocean and Coastal Management
Record number
2279246
Link To Document