Title of article :
Th.o.m.a.s.: An exploratory assessment of Theory of Mind in schizophrenic subjects
Author/Authors :
Bosco، نويسنده , , Francesca M. and Colle، نويسنده , , Livia and Fazio، نويسنده , , Silvia De and Bono، نويسنده , , Adele and Ruberti، نويسنده , , Saverio and Tirassa، نويسنده , , Maurizio، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Abstract :
A large body of literature agrees that persons with schizophrenia suffer from a Theory of Mind (ToM) deficit. However, most empirical studies have focused on third-person, egocentric ToM, underestimating other facets of this complex cognitive skill. Aim of this research is to examine the ToM of schizophrenic persons considering its various aspects (first- vs. second-order, first- vs. third-person, egocentric vs. allocentric, beliefs vs. desires vs. positive emotions vs. negative emotions and how each of these mental state types may be dealt with), to determine whether some components are more impaired than others.
eloped a Theory of Mind Assessment Scale (Th.o.m.a.s.) and administered it to 22 persons with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia and a matching control group. Th.o.m.a.s. is a semi-structured interview which allows a multi-component measurement of ToM. Both groups were also administered a few existing ToM tasks and the schizophrenic subjects were administered the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale and the WAIS-R.
hizophrenic persons performed worse than control at all the ToM measurements; however, these deficits appeared to be differently distributed among different components of ToM.
nclusion is that ToM deficits are not unitary in schizophrenia, which also testifies to the importance of a complete and articulated investigation of ToM.
Keywords :
Schizophrenia , assessment , Mindreading , theory of mind , clinical interview , Allocentric perspective , First-person , Third-person , Egocentric perspective
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition