Title of article :
Partial awareness distinguishes between measuring conscious perception and conscious content: Reply to Dienes and Seth
Author/Authors :
Timmermans، نويسنده , , Bert and Sandberg، نويسنده , , Kristian and Cleeremans، نويسنده , , Axel and Overgaard، نويسنده , , Morten، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
Abstract :
In their comment on Sandberg, Timmermans, Overgaard, and Cleeremans (2010), Dienes and Seth argue that increased sensitivity of the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) is a consequence of the scale being less exclusive rather than more exhaustive. According to Dienes and Seth, this is because PAS may measure some conscious content, though not necessarily relevant conscious content, “If one saw a square but was only aware of seeing a flash of something, then one has not consciously seen a square.” In this reply, we claim that there is a difference between conscious visual experience, which may be partial, and the resulting conscious content, which is conceptual. Whereas PAS measures the first, confidence judgments and post-decision wagering measure the second.
Keywords :
Methodology , Consciousness , Subliminal perception , Post-decision wagering , Partial awareness , Perceptual Awareness Scale , Confidence ratings
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition