Title of article :
The classification of recovered memories: A cautionary note
Author/Authors :
Raymaekers، نويسنده , , Linsey and Smeets، نويسنده , , Tom and Peters، نويسنده , , Maarten J.V. and Otgaar، نويسنده , , Henry and Merckelbach، نويسنده , , Harald، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Pages :
4
From page :
1640
To page :
1643
Abstract :
Traditionally, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) have been classified as those emerging spontaneously versus those surfacing during the course of suggestive therapy. There are indications that reinterpretation of memories might be a third route to recovered memories. Thus, recovered memories do not form a homogeneous category. Nevertheless, the conceptual distinctions between the various types of recovered memories remain difficult for researchers and clinicians. With this in mind, the current study explored whether recovered memories can be reliably classified. We found that classification is rather problematic in a subset of cases. To reduce potential bias, we urge for the development and subsequent use of a more reliable classification system and multiple expert raters in research on recovered memories.
Keywords :
Classification , Childhood Sexual Abuse , Recovered memories , Expert raters
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition
Serial Year :
2012
Journal title :
Consciousness and Cognition
Record number :
2292373
Link To Document :
بازگشت