Mass transfer in the satellite system of Neptune: implications for Tritonʹs crater asymmetry

In this paper, we shall analyse a promising way to explain the huge crater asymmetry observed on Triton, the largest of Neptuneʹs satellites. Triton shows, as well as many other satellites in the Solar System, a non-symmetric crater distribution on its surface. This fact is principally due to the synchronous rotation of these satellites, as shown by many theoretical works (see Shoemaker and Wolfe, Satellites of Jupiter, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1992, p. 277; Horedt and Neukum, Icarus 60 (1984) 710; Zahnle et al., Icarus 136 (1998) 202; Zahnle et al., Icarus 153 (2001) 111). However, on Triton the asymmetry is much more pronounced than on other satellites, and it exceeds what the models, in which the source of the craters are bodies in heliocentric orbits, can account for. For this reason, many authors (Croft et al., Icarus 99 (1992) 94; Schenk and Sobieszczyk, American Astronomical Society, DPS Meeting, Vol. 31, 1999; Zahnle et al., Icarus 153 (2001) 111) proposed that the origin for Tritonʹs asymmetry has to be found in a swarm of bodies having planetocentric orbits, instead of heliocentric ones. Here, we analyse from a dynamical point of view the possibility that such swarm of fragments was generated by a collision between an inner satellite and a third object (a process we call ‘mass transfer’). Moreover, we discuss the possibility that the observed crater distribution on Triton comes from two populations: heliocentric bodies responsible for a few big craters, plus planetocentric bodies responsible for the big asymmetry. y, we discuss some implications for ground observations.