Author/Authors :
محمدي ، نجمه نويسنده Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , , فروز، مريم نويسنده Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Ferooz , Maryam , اسكندريان، طاهره نويسنده , , باقري، رفعت نويسنده ,
Abstract :
Statement of Problem: There is no enough published data about the shear bond
strength of resin modified glass ionomer adhesives on caries-affected primary
tooth dentin excavated using minimally invasive systems.
Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength of 2 different adhesives (one
resin modified glass ionomer and one resin) using two caries removal techniques
on healthy and caries-affected primary dentin.
Materials and Methods: Two caries removal methods including mechanical
(handpiece) and chemomechanical (Carisolv) techniques and two types of adhesives
including one resin adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond; CSEB, Kuraray) and
one resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive (Riva Bond LC; RBLC, SDI) were
used in this study. Ten extracted healthy primary teeth were used for the control
group. The teeth were sectioned bucco-lingually and mesio-distally in order to
obtain four specimens from each tooth. Thirty suitable specimens were selected
as the “control” and randomly divided into two groups of “sound dentin” based
on the type of the adhesive used. Sixty extracted caries affected teeth were
used for the carious group; sectioned as mentioned above and sixty suitable
specimens were selected as the “treatment”. Then the specimens were arbitrarily
divided into four groups based on caries removal techniques and the type of adhesive
used (n = 15). After bonding with either CSEB or RBLC, the specimens
were restored with a resin composite by means of PVC tubes and subjected to
the shear bond strength test. The data was analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s
test.
Results: The specimens in Carisolv group bonded with CSEB (11.68 ± 3.1)
showed a statistically significant higher mean bond strength followed by those
in handpiece group bonded with CSEB (9.4 ± 2.7), which exhibited higher mean
values than those groups with RBLC (p < 0.05). Shear bond strength values for
Clearfil SE Bond was not significantly higher than Riva Bond LC when used in
sound dentin.
Conclusions: The lowest shear bond strengths for both adhesives were observed