Author/Authors :
Shakerkhatibi، Mohammad نويسنده Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health and Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences , , Mohammadi، Nahideh نويسنده MSc Student, Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , , Zoroufchi Benis، Khaled نويسنده Assistant Professor, Environmental Engineering Research Center, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran , , Behrooz Sarand، Alireza نويسنده Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia, Iran , , Fatehifar، Esmaeil نويسنده Advanced Technologies and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, I.R. IRAN , , Asl Hashemi، Ahmad نويسنده 1Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ,
Abstract :
Background: Forecasting of air pollutants has become a popular topic of environmental research today. For this purpose, the artificial neural network (AAN) technique is widely used as a reliable method for forecasting air pollutants in urban areas. On the other hand, the evolutionary polynomial regression (EPR) model has recently been used as a forecasting tool in some environmental issues. In this research, we compared the ability of these models to forecast carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations in the urban area of Tabriz city.
Methods: The dataset of CO concentrations measured at the fixed stations operated by the East
Azerbaijan Environmental Office along with meteorological data obtained from the East Azerbaijan Meteorological Bureau from March 2007 to March 2013, were used as input for the ANN and EPR models.
Results: Based on the results, the performance of ANN is more reliable in comparison with EPR.
Using the ANN model, the correlation coefficient values at all monitoring stations were calculated above 0.85. Conversely, the R2 values for these stations were obtained < 0.41 using the EPR model.
Conclusion: The EPR model could not overcome the nonlinearities of input data. However, the ANN model displayed more accurate results compared to the EPR. Hence, the ANN models are robust tools for predicting air pollutant concentrations.
