Title of article :
No time for smokescreen skepticism: A rejoinder to Shani and Arad
Author/Authors :
Hall، نويسنده , , C. Michael and Amelung، نويسنده , , Bas and Cohen، نويسنده , , Scott and Eijgelaar، نويسنده , , Eke and Gِssling، نويسنده , , Stefan and Higham، نويسنده , , James and Leemans، نويسنده , , Rik and Peeters، نويسنده , , Paul and Ram، نويسنده , , Yael and Scott، نويسنده , , Daniel and Aall، نويسنده , , Carlo and Abegg، نويسنده , , Bruno and Araٌa، نويسنده , , Jorge E. and Barr، نويسنده , , Stewart and Beck، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Pages :
7
From page :
341
To page :
347
Abstract :
Shani and Arad (2014) claimed that tourism scholars tend to endorse the most pessimistic assessments regarding climate change, and that anthropogenic climate change was a “fashionable” and “highly controversial scientific topic”. This brief rejoinder provides the balance that is missing from such climate change denial and skepticism studies on climate change and tourism. Recent research provides substantial evidence that reports on anthropogenic climate change are accurate, and that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions, including from the tourism industry, play a significant role in climate change. Some positive net effects may be experienced by some destinations in the short-term, but in the long-term all elements of the tourism system will be impacted. The expansion of tourism emissions at a rate greater than efficiency gains means that it is increasingly urgent that the tourism sector acknowledge, accept and respond to climate change. Debate on tourism-related adaptation and mitigation measures is to be encouraged and welcomed. Climate change denial is not.
Keywords :
climate change , GLOBAL WARMING , skepticism , Agnotology , Denial
Journal title :
Tourism Management
Serial Year :
2015
Journal title :
Tourism Management
Record number :
2332799
Link To Document :
بازگشت