Title of article
Denying bogus skepticism in climate change and tourism research
Author/Authors
Hall، نويسنده , , C. Michael and Amelung، نويسنده , , Bas and Cohen، نويسنده , , Scott and Eijgelaar، نويسنده , , Eke and Gِssling، نويسنده , , Stefan and Higham، نويسنده , , James and Leemans، نويسنده , , Rik and Peeters، نويسنده , , Paul and Ram، نويسنده , , Yael and Scott، نويسنده , , Daniel and Aall، نويسنده , , Carlo and Abegg، نويسنده , , Bruno and Araٌa، نويسنده , , Jorge E. and Barr، نويسنده , , Stewart and Beck، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Pages
5
From page
352
To page
356
Abstract
This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.
Keywords
climate change , Agnotology , skepticism , GLOBAL WARMING , Denial
Journal title
Tourism Management
Serial Year
2015
Journal title
Tourism Management
Record number
2332801
Link To Document