Author/Authors :
Hall، نويسنده , , C. Michael and Amelung، نويسنده , , Bas and Cohen، نويسنده , , Scott and Eijgelaar، نويسنده , , Eke and Gِssling، نويسنده , , Stefan and Higham، نويسنده , , James and Leemans، نويسنده , , Rik and Peeters، نويسنده , , Paul and Ram، نويسنده , , Yael and Scott، نويسنده , , Daniel and Aall، نويسنده , , Carlo and Abegg، نويسنده , , Bruno and Araٌa، نويسنده , , Jorge E. and Barr، نويسنده , , Stewart and Beck، نويسنده ,
Abstract :
This final response to the two climate change denial papers by Shani and Arad further highlights the inaccuracies, misinformation and errors in their commentaries. The obfuscation of scientific research and the consensus on anthropogenic climate change may have significant long-term negative consequences for better understanding the implications of climate change and climate policy for tourism and create confusion and delay in developing and implementing tourism sector responses.
Keywords :
climate change , Agnotology , skepticism , GLOBAL WARMING , Denial
