• Title of article

    Comparison of CTOD standards: BS 7448-Part 1 and revised ASTM E1290

  • Author/Authors

    Tagawa ، نويسنده , , Tetsuya and Kayamori، نويسنده , , Yoichi and Ohata، نويسنده , , Mitsuru and Handa، نويسنده , , Tsunehisa and Kawabata، نويسنده , , Tomoya and Yamashita، نويسنده , , Yoichi and Tsutsumi، نويسنده , , Kazuyuki and Yoshinari، نويسنده , , Hitoshi and Aihara، نويسنده , , Shuji and Hagihara، نويسنده , , Yukito، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    327
  • To page
    336
  • Abstract
    Crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) has been calculated using the plastic hinge model with an assumed rotational center since the British Standards Institution (BS) standardized BS5762 in 1979. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) accepted the plastic hinge model and standardized E1290 in 1989. However, ASTM revised E1290 in 2002, and has proposed a conversion from J to CTOD. CTOD-based fracture toughness evaluation has been widely used for the defect assessment of many welded structural components, and two different CTOD calculations could lead to confusion for Fitness-for-Service. In this study, the effects of CTOD testing methodologies on CTOD values were investigated according to round robin tests conducted by the Japan Welding Engineering Society (WES), and the concept of CTOD as a fracture parameter is discussed.
  • Keywords
    Toughness testing , Test standards , Crack Tip Opening Displacement , brittle fracture , J-integral
  • Journal title
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
  • Record number

    2343043