Title of article
PSHA: is it science?
Author/Authors
Castaٌos، نويسنده , , Heriberta and Lomnitz، نويسنده , , Jean Pierre Cinna، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages
3
From page
315
To page
317
Abstract
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is beginning to be seen as unreliable. The problem with PSHA is that its data are inadequate and its logic is defective. Much more reliable, and more scientific, are deterministic procedures, especially when coupled with engineering judgment.
Keywords
earthquakes , Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis , Deterministic seismic hazard analysis
Journal title
Engineering Geology
Serial Year
2002
Journal title
Engineering Geology
Record number
2345212
Link To Document