Title of article :
Thiocyanate hydrometallurgy for the recovery of gold. Part V: Process alternatives for solution concentration and purification
Author/Authors :
Li، نويسنده , , Jinshan and Safarzadeh، نويسنده , , M. Sadegh and Moats، نويسنده , , Michael S. and Miller، نويسنده , , Jan D. and LeVier، نويسنده , , K. Marc and Dietrich، نويسنده , , Meg and Wan، نويسنده , , Rong Yu، نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2012
Abstract :
The gold–thiocyanate system is of interest as it could offer a number of advantages over the gold-cyanide system such as acidic leaching and less toxicity. In the gold–thiocyanate system, the rate of leaching can be accelerated by employing ferric ion as an oxidant. Ultimately, this would lead to a contaminated gold-bearing leach solution that would need to be treated. In this regard, process alternatives for solution concentration and purification are considered including solvent extraction, cementation, and carbon adsorption. The effect of ferric ion on the extraction and stripping of gold was studied. It was demonstrated that ferric ion has an adverse effect on the rate of gold stripping with thiourea. This situation was overcome by controlling the system chemistry-relatively low SCN concentration (0.02 M) in aqueous phase and low amine concentration (0.01–0.02 M) in the organic phase. Strategies other than solvent extraction including cementation with iron and zinc as well as activated carbon adsorption were considered and results reported. Finally, based on this study a conceptual flowsheet is given for the recovery of gold through thiocyanate hydrometallurgy.
Keywords :
Carbon adsorption , Alamine 336 , Gold , Thiocyanate , Ferric iron , Cementation , Solvent extraction , Stripping
Journal title :
HYDROMETALLURGY
Journal title :
HYDROMETALLURGY