Title of article
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A systematic literature review
Author/Authors
Kitchenham، نويسنده , , Barbara and Pearl Brereton، نويسنده , , O. and Budgen، نويسنده , , David and Turner، نويسنده , , Mark and Bailey، نويسنده , , John and Linkman، نويسنده , , Stephen، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2009
Pages
9
From page
7
To page
15
Abstract
Background
4 the concept of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) was introduced at the ICSE04 conference.
tudy assesses the impact of systematic literature reviews (SLRs) which are the recommended EBSE method for aggregating evidence.
d the standard systematic literature review method employing a manual search of 10 journals and 4 conference proceedings.
s
relevant studies, eight addressed research trends rather than technique evaluation. Seven SLRs addressed cost estimation. The quality of SLRs was fair with only three scoring less than 2 out of 4.
sions
tly, the topic areas covered by SLRs are limited. European researchers, particularly those at the Simula Laboratory appear to be the leading exponents of systematic literature reviews. The series of cost estimation SLRs demonstrate the potential value of EBSE for synthesising evidence and making it available to practitioners.
Keywords
Systematic review quality , Cost Estimation , Tertiary study , Evidence-based software engineering , Systematic literature review
Journal title
Information and Software Technology
Serial Year
2009
Journal title
Information and Software Technology
Record number
2374413
Link To Document