Title of article :
Acute Effects of Different Agonist and Antagonist Stretching Arrangements on
Static and Dynamic Range of Motion
Author/Authors :
Amiri-Khorasani، Mohammadtaghi نويسنده Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran , , Kellis، Eleftherios نويسنده Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Department of Physical
Education and Sport Sciences at Serres, Aristotle University of
Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 24 سال 2015
Abstract :
Traditionally, stretching exercises are considered as basic components of warm up aiming to prepare the musculoskeletal system for performance and to prevent injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different agonist and antagonist stretching arrangements within a pre-exercise warm-up on hip static (SROM) and dynamic range of motion (DROM). Sixty trained male subjects (Mean ± SD: height, 177.38 ± 6.92 cm; body mass, 68.4 ± 10.22 kg; age, 21.52 ± 1.17 years) volunteered to participate in this study. SROM was measured by V-sit test and DROM captured by a motion analysis system before and after (i) static stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (SFSE), (ii) dynamic stretching for both hip flexor and extensor muscles (DFDE), (iii) static stretching for the hip flexors and dynamic stretching for hip extensors (SFDE), and (iv) dynamic stretching for the hip flexors and static stretching for hip extensors (DFSE). DFSE showed a significantly higher increase in DROM and SROM than the remainder of the stretching protocols (P < 0.05). There were significant differences between DFDE with SFSE and SFDE (P < 0.05) and SFSE showed significant increase as compared to SFDE (P < 0.05). In conclusion, DFSE is probably the best stretching arrangement due to producing more post activation potentiation on agonist muscles and less muscle stiffness in antagonist muscles.
Journal title :
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
Journal title :
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine