Title of article :
Management of Holding and Evaluating Comprehensive System of Electronic Clinical Reasoning Exams (Sajab) in the Sixth Nationwide Medical Sciences Students Olympiad
Author/Authors :
Khoshbaten، Manouchehr نويسنده Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , , Rasi Marzabadi، Leyla نويسنده Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , , Salek Ranjbarzadeh، Fariba نويسنده Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , , Ghorbani، Sajjad نويسنده Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , , Hassanzadeh Salmasi، Sousan نويسنده Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , , Ahmadian، Ali نويسنده Medical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ,
Issue Information :
دوفصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2015
Pages :
6
From page :
159
To page :
164
Abstract :
Introduction: The Nationwide Medical Sciences Students purpose of the Olympiad is to discover student’s talents and encourage them to study. It seems that holding regional Olympiad exams to select students for the National Olympiad can help us to maintain fairness. The aim of this study is Management of Holding and Evaluating Clinical Reasoning Exams Using a Comprehensive System of Electronic Clinical Reasoning Exams. Methods: Study was carried out in 2013 at the University of Medical Sciences on 750 students, 250 question designers, 37 responsibles. The nationwide universities held regional exams for the Student Olympiad in the area of clinical reasoning on specific dates and times. A quality review of the exams was done to study the strengths and weaknesses and to eliminate shortcomings and problems. Therefore, a researcher created a questionnaire with a reliability of R= 0.86 and validity was confirmed by experts, which was then loaded into the system. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS and descriptive statistics (Percent, Average, standard deviation). Results: The multimedia educational quality of the system, with an average of 69.36 ±22.79, the students and faculty members evaluated as good, with averages of 64.30 ±23.48 and 67.28 ± 22.43, respectively. The quality of the exam was evaluated as excellent by faculty members, with an average of 94.63 ±16.60 and 59.52 ±27.46, by the students. Conclusion: Evaluating the quality of the system’s performance and its ability to assess students will lead to a clarification of its strengths and weaknesses. Finally, result in the creation of a high quality evaluation system.
Journal title :
Research and Development in Medical Education
Serial Year :
2015
Journal title :
Research and Development in Medical Education
Record number :
2385537
Link To Document :
بازگشت