Title of article :
Epidemiological Study of Periocular Dermatitis in a Specialised Hospital Department
Author/Authors :
Rojo-Espa?a، Rafael نويسنده Unit of Dermatology, University Hospital “Dr. Peset”, Valencia, Spain Rojo-Espa?a, Rafael , Tomas-Mallebrera، Lidia نويسنده Unit of Dermatology, University Hospital “Dr. Peset”, Valencia, Spain Tomas-Mallebrera, Lidia , Gimeno-Clemente، Natalia نويسنده CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain AND Unit of Public Health and Environmental Care, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain Gimeno-Clemente, Natalia , Marquina-Vila، Amparo نويسنده Unit of Dermatology, University Hospital “Dr. Peset”, Valencia, Spain Marquina-Vila, Amparo , Morales-Su?rez-Varela، Mar?a نويسنده CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain Morales-Su?rez-Varela, Mar?a
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2011
Pages :
11
From page :
195
To page :
205
Abstract :
Contact dermatitis is frequent skin pathology and eyelids are one of the more frequent locations of this pathology. The objective of the present work was to study the population distribution of periocular dermatitis, determine the allergens which most frequently indicate positive in patch tests and in provocative use tests, and analyse the clinical relevance of the positive tests. Patients with periocular dermatitis (N=93) underwent a thorough physical examination and a patch test with standard series. According to clinical suspicions, 76 patients underwent a patch test with specific series. Finally a provocative use test was done for 36 patients with suspected  products  that  the  patients  brought.  The  tests  were classified according their relevance. The most  frequently observed allergen in the  patch tests (with standard and specific series) was nickel followed by mercury, and anti-glaucoma drops in the provocative use tests with patients products. Patients’ sex, age, occupation, clinical status, presence of associated periocular symptoms, and presence of atopic or seborrheic dermatitis and/or rosacea did not relate with relevance. We conclude that  a clinical diagnosis may not  always be made with patch tests with standard and specific series due to lack of relevance. It is important to do provocative use tests with the products suspected as allergens in those cases where patch tests with standard and specific series indicated positive for more than one allergen.
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Serial Year :
2011
Journal title :
Iranian Journal of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Record number :
2386324
Link To Document :
بازگشت