Author/Authors :
Noormohammadpour، Pardis نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , , Rostami، Mohsen نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center,School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , , Nourian، Ruhollah نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute,
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR
Iran , , Mansournia، Mohammad-Ali نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center , , Sarough Farahani، Saeed نويسنده Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , , Farahbakhsh، Farzin نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , , Kordi، Ramin نويسنده ,
Abstract :
According to anecdotal findings, some wrestling coaches and
wrestlers believe that cauliflower ear might lead to hearing loss. Our
preliminary study showed that the prevalence of hearing loss reported by
the wrestlers with cauliflower ear is significantly higher than this
rate among wrestlers without cauliflower ear. To the best of our
knowledge, no other study has confirmed this finding employing hearing
tests. To evaluate and to compare the prevalence of hearing loss among
wrestlers with and without cauliflower ears employing hearing tests. The
subjects were randomly selected form 14 wrestling clubs in Tehran.
Subjects were 201 wrestlers with cauliflower ears (100 wrestlers with
one cauliflower ear and 101 wrestlers with two cauliflower ears) and 139
wrestlers without cauliflower ears. All the participants in this study
were interviewed to collect information on demographic factors and
medical history of risk factors and diseases related to hearing loss.
The subjects in both groups underwent otoscopic and audiologic
examinations. Audiometric examination results at the frequency range of
0.5 - 8 KHz showed that the prevalence of hearing loss among cauliflower
ears was higher than this rate among non-cauliflower ears. Also, the
percentage of positive history of ear infections among cauliflower ears
(8.4%) was about two times more than this finding among non-cauliflower
ears (4.9%). This difference tended to be significant (OR: 1.86, P =
0.06, 95% CI: 0.98 - 3.53). To the best of our knowledge, this is the
first study showing that the prevalence of hearing loss among
cauliflower ears is higher than this rate among non-cauliflower ears
confirmed by audiological tests. This emphasizes that, more preventive
measures such as mandatory ear gear for wrestlers are
required.