Title of article :
Local-Reference Patient Dose Evaluation in Conventional Radiography Examinations in Mazandaran, Iran
Author/Authors :
Khoshdel-Navi ، D نويسنده School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , , Shabestani-Monfared، A نويسنده Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , , Deevband، M R نويسنده Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , , Abdi، R نويسنده Department of Radiology, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran , , Nabahati، M نويسنده Department of Radiology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2016
Abstract :
Background: The most effcient application of ionizing radiation is serving medical purposes and using this radiation has caused people to learn that artifcial sources
of radiation exposure among these resources can be of highest exposure rate.
Obiective: The present study is aimed at initially establishing a baseline for localreference dose level in Mazandaran, Iran in 12 projections of the most conventional
x-ray examination.
Methods: In this study, 13 public hospitals in Mazandaran province were selected for review and required data collected for ten adult patients with mean weight of
70±10kg in each projection. Then, information of each center was separately analyzed.
Next, in order to measure x-ray output tube, the dosimeter RTI model Barracuda calibrated has been applied for measuring air karma within energy rage of 40-150kvp.
ESAK and ESD parameters, usually used for monitoring DRL in conventional radiography, were calculated.
Results: Mean ESDs in this study has been obtained to 1.47±0.98 for skull (PA/
AP), 1.01±0.79 for skull (LAT), 0.67±0.38 for cervical spine (AP), 0.79±0.37 for cervical (LAT), 0.49±0.38 for chest (PA/AP), 1.06±0.44 for chest (LAT), 2.15±0.73 for
thoracic spine (AP), 3±0.87 for thoracic spine (LAT), 2.81 ±0.82 for lumbar spine
(AP), 4.28±0.78 for lumbar (LAT), 2.07±1.17 for abdomen and 1.90±0.99 for pelvis,
respectively. The ESDs calculated for chest examination in both projections, PA and
LAT are more than values recommended by the UK (2000), Brazil and Slovenia.
Conclusion: The present study has determined wide variations in radiation dose
of x-ray examinations among hospitals in Mazandaran, Iran. In order to reduce skin
dose, an optimization procedure should be considered. Application of a reference dose
(DRL) could be a practical method for this purpose. The role of optimization of radiography parameters for reducing patient dose is a signifcant issue. Through optimizing
parameters, it would be possible to preserve image quality while reduction of patient
dose.
Journal title :
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
Journal title :
Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering