Title of article :
Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders
Author/Authors :
Pilehvari، Shamim نويسنده Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Pilehvari, Shamim , Shahrokh Tehraninejad، Ensieh نويسنده , , Hosseinrashidi، Batool نويسنده Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Hosseinrashidi, Batool , Keikhah، Fatemeh نويسنده Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Keikhah, Fatemeh , Haghollahi، Fedyeh نويسنده Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , , Aziminekoo، Elham نويسنده Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2016
Pages :
7
From page :
35
To page :
41
Abstract :

Objective: To compare the pregnancy outcomes achieved by in vitro fertilization (IVF) between minimal stimulation and conventional antagonist protocols in poor ovarian responders (PORs).
Materials and methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 77 PORs undergoing IVF were selected and divided into two groups. First group was the minimal stimulation group (n = 42) receiving 100 mg/day clomiphene citrate on day 2of the cycle for 5 day that was followed by150IU/day human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) on day 5 of the cycle. Second group was the conventional group (n = 35) receiving at least 300 IU/daygonadotropin on day 2 of the cycle. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol was applied for both groups according to flexible protocol. Number of retrieved oocytes and chemical pregnancy rate were the main outcomes.
Results: There was no difference in number ofretrieved oocyte and pregnancy rate (2.79 ± 1.96 vs. 2.20 ± 1.71 and 5.6% vs. 4.1%; p > 0.05) between both groups. The gonadotropin dose used in the minimal stimulation group was lower than conventional group (1046 ± 596 vs. 2806 ± 583).
Conclusion: Minimal stimulation protocol with lower gonadotropin used is likely to be considered as a patient- friendly and cost-effective substitute for PORs.

 

Journal title :
Journal of Family and Reproductive Health
Serial Year :
2016
Journal title :
Journal of Family and Reproductive Health
Record number :
2395362
Link To Document :
بازگشت