Title of article
A comparative study on curriculum of geriatric nursing master’s degree in Iran and Ireland
Author/Authors
Sadat-Aghahosseini، Shima نويسنده Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Sadat-Aghahosseini, Shima , Navab، Elham نويسنده Department of Critical Care Nursing and Management, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , , Sadooghiasl، Afsaneh نويسنده PhD in Nursing, Department of Management, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran Sadooghiasl, Afsaneh
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2016
Pages
7
From page
19
To page
25
Abstract
Background & Aim: Comparison of existing curriculums together helps to identify strengths and weaknesses of the program and provide to improve healthy competition. This study aimed to compare geriatric nursing curriculum in Iran and Ireland.
Methods & Materials: This study was carried out in 2015 using Beredy model. Research community was geriatric nursing curriculums in Iran and Ireland. Comparative elements were the mission and objectives, duration and course titles, student admission, working opportunity for graduates, and tui-tion in four steps of description, interpretation, proximity and comparison.
Results: In Iran, the main focus of program was on clinic, teaching, and research; and employment opportunities were too general. In addition, student admission was centralized and normative and tuition was free. In Ireland, job opportunities were more objective and proportionate to the objectives of the program; admission was done via a decentralized model and students should have selection criteria. In addition, tuition was not free.
Conclusion: Geriatric nursing curriculum in Iran should be revised to define objective working op-portunities for graduates activities in community, to change methods for admitting student appropriate to their interests and academic and professional backgrounds, and to design educational program for tutor and researcher training.
Methods & Materials: This study was carried out in 2015 using Beredy model. Research community was geriatric nursing curriculums in Iran and Ireland. Comparative elements were the mission and objectives, duration and course titles, student admission, working opportunity for graduates, and tui-tion in four steps of description, interpretation, proximity and comparison.
Results: In Iran, the main focus of program was on clinic, teaching, and research; and employment opportunities were too general. In addition, student admission was centralized and normative and tuition was free. In Ireland, job opportunities were more objective and proportionate to the objectives of the program; admission was done via a decentralized model and students should have selection criteria. In addition, tuition was not free.
Conclusion: Geriatric nursing curriculum in Iran should be revised to define objective working op-portunities for graduates activities in community, to change methods for admitting student appropriate to their interests and academic and professional backgrounds, and to design educational program for tutor and researcher training.
Journal title
Nursing Practice Today
Serial Year
2016
Journal title
Nursing Practice Today
Record number
2395864
Link To Document