Title of article :
Shear Bond Strengths of Methacrylate and Silorane based Composite Resins to Feldspathic Porcelain using Different Adhesive Systems
Author/Authors :
Mohammadi، Narmin نويسنده Faculty of Dentistry,Department of Restorative Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz,Iran , , Shakur Shahabi، Maryam نويسنده Faculty of Dentistry,Department of Restorative Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz,Iran , , Kimyai، Soodabeh نويسنده Faculty of Dentistry,Department of Restorative Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz,Iran , , Pournagi Azar، Fatemeh نويسنده Faculty of Dentistry,Department of Restorative Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz,Iran , , Ebrahimi Chaharom، Mohammad Esmaeel نويسنده Faculty of Dentistry,Department of Restorative Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences,Tabriz,Iran ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Abstract :
Background and aims. Use of porcelain as inlays, laminates and metal ceramic and all ceramic crowns is common in modern dentistry. The high cost of ceramic restorations, time limitations and difficulty of removing these restorations result in delays in replacing fractured restorations therefore, their repair is indicated. The aim of the present study was to compare the shear bond strengths of two types of composite resins (methacrylate based and silorane based) to porcelain, using three adhesive types.Materials and methods. A total of 156 sles of feldspathic porcelain surfaces were prepared with air abrasion and randomly divided into 6 groups (n=26). In groups 1?3, Z250 composite resin was used to repair porcelain sles with Ad per Single Bond 2 (ASB), Clearfil SE Bond (CSB) and Silorane Adhesive (SA) as the bonding systems, afterapplication of silane, respectively. In groups 4?6, the same adhesives were used in the same manner with Filtek Silorane composite resin. Finally, the shear bond strengths of the sles were measured. Two way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests were used to compare bond strengths between the groups with different adhesives at P<0.05.Results. There were significant differences in the mean bond strength values in terms of the adhesive type (P<0.001). In addition, the interactive effect of the adhesive type and composite resin type had no significant effect on bond strength (P=0.602).Conclusion. The results of the present study showed the highest repair bond strength values to porcelain with both composite resin types with the application of SA and ASB.
Keywords :
Adhesive , Bond strength , Porcelain , Silorane
Journal title :
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Journal title :
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects