Title of article :
Cast Partial Denture versus Acrylic Partial Denture for Replacement of Missing Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients
Author/Authors :
-، - نويسنده Additional Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal Suwal, Pramita , -، - نويسنده Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. Singh, Raj Kumar , -، - نويسنده Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal Ayer, Ashok , -، - نويسنده Postgraduate resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal. Roy, Deepak Kumar , -، - نويسنده Lecturer, Department of Community Medicine, Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepalgunj, Nepal. Roy, Roshan Kumar
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی 0 سال 2017
Pages :
8
From page :
27
To page :
34
Abstract :
-
Abstract :
Aim: To compare the effects of cast partial denture with conventional all acrylic denture in respect to retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort and periodontal health of abutments. Methods: 50 adult partially edentulous patient seeking for replacement of missing teeth having Kennedy class I and II arches with or without modification areas were selected for the study. Group-A was treated with cast partial denture and Group-B with acrylic partial denture. Data collected during follow-up visit of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year by evaluating retention, stability, masticatory efficiency, comfort, periodontal health of abutment. Results: Chi-square test was applied to find out differences between the groups at 95% confidence interval where p = 0.05. One year comparison shows that cast partial denture maintained retention and stability better than acrylic partial denture (p< 0.05). The masticatory efficiency was significantly compromising from 3rd month to 1 year in all acrylic partial denture groups (p< 0.05). The comfort of patient with cast partial denture was maintained better during the observation period (p< 0.05). Periodontal health of abutment was gradually deteriorated in all acrylic denture group (p<0.05). Conclusions: With adequate maintenance of oral and denture hygiene at a regular interval, cast partial denture compared with acrylic partial denture provides better results in terms of retention, stability, comfort and periodontal health of abutment.
Journal title :
Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques - JDMT
Journal title :
Journal of Dental Materials and Techniques - JDMT
Record number :
2397103
Link To Document :
بازگشت