Title of article :
Operating Room Time Savings with the Use of Splint Packs: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Author/Authors :
Gonzalez، Tyler A. نويسنده Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Harvard Medical School,Boston,USA , , Bluman، Eric M. نويسنده Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Harvard Medical School,Boston,USA , , Palms، David نويسنده Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Harvard Medical School,Boston,USA , , Smith، Jeremy T. نويسنده Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Harvard Medical School,Boston,USA , , Chiodo، Christopher P. نويسنده Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Harvard Medical School,Boston,USA ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2016
Pages :
6
From page :
10
To page :
15
Abstract :
Background: The most expensive variable in the operating room (OR) is time. Lean Process Management is being used in the medical field to improve efficiency in the OR. Streamlining individual processes within the OR is crucial to a comprehensive time saving and cost-cutting health care strategy. At our institution, one hour of OR time costs approximately $500, exclusive of supply and personnel costs. Commercially prepared splint packs (SP) contain all components necessary for plaster-of-Paris short-leg splint application and have the potential to decrease splint application time and overall costs by making it a more lean process. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing OR time savings between SP use and bulk supply (BS) splint application. Methods: Fifty consecutive adult operative patients on whom post-operative short-leg splint immobilization was indicated were randomized to either a control group using BS or an experimental group using SP. One orthopaedic surgeon (EMB) prepared and applied all of the splints in a standardized fashion. Retrieval time, preparation time, splint application time, and total splinting time for both groups were measured and statistically analyzed. Results: The retrieval time, preparation time and total splinting time were significantly less (p<0.001) in the SP group compared with the BS group. There was no significant difference in application time between the SP group and BS group. Conclusion: The use of SP made the process of splinting more lean. This has resulted in an average of 2 minutes 52 seconds saved in total splinting time compared to BS, making it an effective cost-cutting and time saving technique. For high volume ORs, use of splint packs may contribute to substantial time and cost savings without impacting patient safety.
Keywords :
Foot and ankle , Lower extremity , Operating Room , ambulatory surgery , Economics , efficiency , Splinting
Journal title :
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Journal title :
The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery
Record number :
2398505
Link To Document :
بازگشت