Author/Authors :
Khoshhal، Masoumeh نويسنده Department of Periodontics, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran , , Vafaee، Fariborz نويسنده Dental Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran , , Abbasi Atibeh، Erfan نويسنده Department of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, Hamadan
University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran , , Moradi، Oranous نويسنده Dental Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences,
Hamadan, IR Iran , , Rastegarfard، Neda نويسنده Department of Periodontology, Dental Faculty, Hamadan
University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran , , Ghadermarzi، Khaled نويسنده Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental
Faculty, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR
Iran , , Sharifi، Shahram نويسنده Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University ,
Abstract :
Implant-supported overdentures could have many benefits for
patients, especially in the lower jaws. As a matter of fact, the most
common reason for prescribing mandibular overdenture is dissatisfaction
of patients with mandibular dentures usually because of a lack of
retention, stability and function and speech difficulties. On the other
hand, patients' expectations of overdenture treatments are
their main disadvantage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
satisfaction of patients who had received mandibular implant supported
overdenture treatment with different number of implants. This study was
a descriptive cross-sectional study. Twenty-five patients with a mean
age of 62.7 years who had received mandibular implant supported
overdenture treatment at the dental school of Hamadan University of
Medical Sciences were enrolled. Among these patients, six had
overdentures supported by one implant, nine had overdentures supported
by two implants, two had overdentures supported by three implants, five
had overdentures supported by four implants and three had overdentures
supported by five implants. The visual analogue scale (VAS)
questionnaire was used to evaluate the general satisfaction, comfort,
esthetic, fitness, satisfaction of chewing and social communication, and
the data was analyzed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. All
patients in all five groups were satisfied with their overdentures;
however there was no significant relationship between the number of
implants and fitness (P = 0.446), esthetic (P = 0.843), comfort (P =
0.805), satisfaction of chewing (P = 0.133), social communication (P =
0.322) and general satisfaction (P = 0.493). There was no difference in
satisfaction level of patients who had received mandibular overdentures
with different number of implants.