Author/Authors :
Shojaee، Majid نويسنده Imam Hossein Hospital,Emergency Department,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran , , Hakimzadeh، Farhad نويسنده Imam Hossein Hospital,Emergency Department,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran , , Mohammadi، Parisa نويسنده Imam Hossein Hospital,Emergency Department,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran , , Sabzghabaei، Anita نويسنده Loghman Hakim Hospital,Emergency Department,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran , , Manouchehrifar، Mohammad نويسنده Loghman Hakim Hospital,Emergency Department,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran , , Arhami Dolatabadi، Ali نويسنده Imam Hossein Hospital,Emergency Department,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran ,
Abstract :
Introduction: Ankle fracture is one of the most common joint fractures. Xray and physical examination are itsmain methods of diagnosis. Recently, ultrasonography (US) is considered as a simple and noninvasive methodof fracture diagnosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of US in detection of ankle fracture in comparisonto plain radiography. Methods: In this diagnostic accuracy study, which was done in emergency departmentsof Imam Hossein and Shohadaye Tajrish hospitals, Tehran, Iran, during 2014, 141 patients with suspecteddiagnosis of distal leg or ankle fracture were examined by US and radiography (gold standard), independently.Screening performance characteristics of US in detection of distal leg fractures were calculated using SPSS version21. Results: 141 patients with the mean age of 34§11.52 years (range: 15–50) were evaluated (75.9% male).Radiography confirmed ankle fracture in 102 (72.3%) patients. There was a significant correlation between theresults of US and radiography [Agreement: 95%; kappa: 0.88 (95% CI: 0.80–0.97); P Ç 0.001]. The screening performancecharacteristics of US in detection ankle fracture were as follows: sensitivity 98.9% (95% CI: 93.5% 99.9%), specificity 86.4% (95% CI: 71.9%–94.3%), PPV 94.1% (95% CI: 87.1%–97.6%), NPV 97.4% (95% CI: 84.9%–99.8%), PLR 16 (95% CI: 7.3–34.8), and NLR 0.02 (95% CI: 0.003 – 0.182). The area under the ROC curve of USin this regard was 95.8 (95% CI: 91.9§99.7). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, we can use USas an accurate and noninvasive method with high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis ofmalleolus fractures.However, the inherent limitations of US such as operator dependency should be considered in this regard.