Title of article :
Evaluation of Drug Regimens Used for the Prophylaxis of Thromboembolic Events in a Referral Cancer Center in North of Iran
Author/Authors :
Dehkia، Saeed نويسنده Student Research Committee, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran Dehkia, Saeed , Kouchaki، Bizhan نويسنده Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. Kouchaki, Bizhan , Janbabaei، Ghasem نويسنده Molecular Cell-Biology Research Center, Faculty of Medicine,Department of Internal Medicine,Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences,Sari,Iran , , Shekarriz، Ramin نويسنده Department of Hematology-Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Shekarriz, Ramin , Ala، Shahram نويسنده Faculty of Pharmacy, Phramaceutical Resaerch Center,Department of Clinical Pharmacy,Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences,Sari,Iran , , Salehifar، Ebrahim نويسنده ,
Issue Information :
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2015
Pages :
6
From page :
61
To page :
66
Abstract :

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of mortality among cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate drug regimens used for the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in cancer patients.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using medical records of patients hospitalized from March 2012 to March 2014 at Cancer Division of A tertiary university-affiliated hospital in North of Iran. The risk factors of patients regarding need of venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis were recognized and dosage and duration of thromboembolic prophylactic agents were evaluated according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2012 guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.23.

Results: Of a total of 1160 medical records, VTE prophylaxis regimens of 186 patients were evaluated. In 18(13.1%) and 15(10.9%) of patients, administrations were compatible with NCCN guidelines with respect to the "type of drug" and "dosage", respectively. Only in 7(5.1%) of patients administrations were compatible with respect to the "duration of thromboembolic prophylaxis regimen". Forty patients (21.7%) had relative contraindication for thromboembolic prophylaxis and 7(3.8%) patients had absolute contraindication. In 32(80%) of 40 patients with relative contraindications and only in 1(14.3%) of 7 patients with absolute contraindications, physicians’ orders were compatible with NCCN guidelines.

Conclusion: The rate of concordance of the VTE prophylaxis with recommendations provided by NCCN is very poor. This study emphasizes need of a multidisciplinary action to improve the VTE prophylaxis in cancer patients. 

Journal title :
Journal of Pharmaceutical Care
Serial Year :
2015
Journal title :
Journal of Pharmaceutical Care
Record number :
2404144
Link To Document :
بازگشت