Author/Authors :
Razavi Deligan Mohammad Reza نويسنده , Ghorbani Raheb نويسنده Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Community Medicine Department, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, IR Iran , Forozeshfard Mohammad نويسنده Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, IR Iran , Eskandarian Rahimeh نويسنده Department of Cardiology, Kowsar Hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, IR Iran , Safaei Somayeh نويسنده Clinical Research Development Unit (CRDU), Kowsar
hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan,
Iran
Abstract :
Background Non-invasive and cost effective treatments of coronary
artery disease (CAD) are a health priority and a current necessity.
Objectives This study aimed at comparing the results of myocardial
perfusion imaging (MPI) with coronary angiography findings in the
diagnosis of CAD. Methods This cross sectional study included 155
patients with stable angina, who were referred to Kowsar hospital,
Semnan, Iran, from May 2013 to April 2014. After confirmation of
positive perfusion imaging, angiography was performed within 3 months.
Myocardial perfusion imaging results were categorized as mild, moderate
and severe, and also in coronary angiography, narrowing of more than 50%
of the vessels was considered as significant stenosis. Results Mean age
was 58.3 ± 11.5 and 82 (52.9%) of the participants were male. According
to MPI, the lateral wall of the myocardia (44.5%) was the most common
affected area. Abnormal angiographic findings were reported in 47.7% (n
= 74) of the patients. The number of affected vessels in the angiography
had a positive correlation with the scan score (r = 0.501 and P =
0.001). The MPI had less than 50% sensitivity and more than 72%
specificity. Conclusions This study indicated that MPI and coronary
angiography findings had a positive correlation. The sensitivity of MPI
was less than optimal, and it may be better if supplemented by other
diagnostic techniques for diagnosis CAD.