Author/Authors :
Rezaei Mehdi نويسنده Faculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering , Dabiri Golchin Minoo نويسنده Faculty of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Mirzakhani Navid نويسنده Physiotherapy Research Centre, School of Rehabilitation,
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran , Stagnitti Karen نويسنده School of Health and Social Development, Deakin
University, Geelong, Australia, 3220 , Dabiri Golchin Mahsa نويسنده Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background Play, particularly pretend play, has a cognitive basis
and has been linked to the language and social ability. Objectives The
goal of this study was to examine face and content validity,
inter-rater, intra-rater and test-retest reliability of the Persian
translation of the child-initiated pretend play assessment Methods Ten
occupational therapists consented to be in the content validity study.
Face validity was examined by five occupational therapy specialists. For
reliability, 31 typically developing children aged 4 - 6 years were
chosen from kindergartens of four regions of Tehran, Iran. Two weeks
after the initial assessment the children were re-tested for test-retest
reliability. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability was scored from
videos of the children’s play assessment. Results To be culturally
appropriate for Iran, some phrases were changed and the pigs were
replaced by dogs. Content validity index (CVI) and content validity
ratio (CVR) were acceptable for all items. The Intra-class correlation
coefficient was ICC = 0.99 for intra-rater reliability and ICC = 0.98
for inter-rater reliability. For test-retest reliability, the
intra-class correlation coefficient for symbolic and combined object
substitution scores and all elaborate play scores ranged from ICC = 0.69
to - 0.99. For imitated actions, the majority of children scored 0 on
both test and re-test. Conclusions The Persian version of child
initiated pretend play assessment has appropriate face and content
validity. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were excellent. PEPA,
combined and symbolic NOS showed good to excellent test-retest
reliability. Test retest reliability for conventional NOS was moderate
and NIA was not stable with more children imitating the examiner in the
first test but not the re-test.