Author/Authors :
Karaca Semra نويسنده Psychiatric Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Science, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey , Karakoc Ayse نويسنده Midwifery Department, Faculty of Health Science, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey , Uysal Gulzade نويسنده Department of Pediatric Nursing, Health School, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey , Sonmez Duzkaya Duygu نويسنده PhD., Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Directorate of Nursing
Service, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey , Temizsoy Ebru نويسنده Msc., Ministry of Health, Zeynep Kamil Obstetrics and
Pediatric Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul,
Turkey , Cangur Sengul نويسنده Associate Professor PhD., Department of Biostatistics and
Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce,
Turkey
Abstract :
Background It is important to check the skin of neonates on a
daily basis so that abnormal conditions and skin problems are
identified. Objectives This study aimed at testing the validity and
reliability of a revised Northampton Neonatal skin assessment tool in
Turkish; a review to determine whether it is valid and reliable in the
care of neonates. Methods The research had a cross-sectional and
methodological design. The data for the study was collected between 1st
of January 2015, and 20th of June 2015, at the neonatal intensive care
unit (NICU) of a major training and research hospital in
Istanbul/Turkey; 362 neonatal skin assessments were executed. The
revised toolʹs language, face, content, construct validity, and
reliability were evaluated. Results The intra-class correlation
coefficient, which indicates interrater reliability, was 1.00 in the
study, representing 100% agreement. The Cronbach alpha internal
consistency coefficient revealed that the tool’s general reliability was
at an acceptable level (Cα = 0.71). Although the model was not found to
be significant (Chi-square = 46.22, df = 17, and P < 0.001), the
other model fit indices found RMSEA < 0.07,
χ2/df < 3, and SRMR<0.06, which
meant that the data had an acceptable fit for the model. The model
exhibited a good fit because the CFI, NFI, GFI, and AGFI indices were
close to 1. When the model fit indices were evaluated in combination,
the CFA model generally had a good fit. The most significant and most
prominent effect on the tool was the impact of NNS9 (level of care)
indicator (b9 = 0.86, t value = 17.46 >
1.96). Conclusions The Turkish version of the revised northampton
neonatal skin assessment tool is an appropriate, valid, and reliable
instrument to be used in the assessment of neonatal skin, especially of
infants at the NICU. The tool may be recommended for use in the care of
neonates.