Title of article :
Evaluation of Overcrowding of Emergency Department in Imam Reza Hospital in
2015 by Implementing 2 Scales: NEDOCS and EDWIN
Author/Authors :
Rahmani Farzad نويسنده Department of Emergency medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , Soleimanpour Hassan نويسنده Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran , Ala Alireza نويسنده Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , Soleimanpour Maryam نويسنده Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran , Mehdizadeh Esfanjani Robab نويسنده Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of
Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran , Rezazadeh Farzin نويسنده Students’ Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical
Sciences, Tabriz, IR Iran
Abstract :
Background The reason behind patients’ overcrowding in emergency
departments (ED) may be due to several factors such as great number of
referring patients or inaccessibility of facilities or hospital beds.
Objectives The present study aimed at evaluating the overcrowding of ED
in Tabriz Imam Reza hospital in 2015 using 2 scales: National Emergency
Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS), and Emergency Department Work Index
(EDWIN). Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted
in the ED of Imam Reza hospital affiliated to Tabriz University of
Medical Sciences, Iran, in a one-year period (Jan- Dec 2015).
Convenience sampling method was used for data collection. During the
study, the researchers randomly selected 10 days out of every month and
started to collect index variables 4 times a day at 6 AM, 12 noon, 6 PM,
and 12 midnight. In total, 488 samples were gathered and both NEDOCS and
EDWIN were implemented for each sample. Then, the frequency of
overcrowding in the emergency department was reported based on the
obtained results. Results Based on NEDOCS, ED was extremely busy, but
not overcrowded in 51 cases (10.5%), it was overcrowded in 298 (61.1%)
cases, severely overcrowded in 138 cases (28.3%), and it was busy only
in one case (0.2%). However, based on the EDWIN scale, the ED was active
but manageable in 91 cases (18.6%), very busy in 36 cases (7.4%), and
extremely busy in the remaining 361 cases (74%). Conclusions EDWIN scale
depicted August, July, December, June, and April to be, respectively,
the most overcrowded months. This finding revealed EDWIN scale to
perform better when trying to have an overall assessment of ED during
the whole year, which helps us have clear- cut results for analysis and
policy making in managing EDs.
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics