Author/Authors :
Radovic Tamara Cuk نويسنده Poliklinika Nola, Zagreb, Croatia , Kostovic Kresimir نويسنده Department of Dermatovenereology, University Hospital
Center Zagreb and School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb,
Croatia , Ceovic Romana نويسنده Department of Dermatovenereology, University Hospital
Center Zagreb and School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb,
Croatia , Mokos Zrinka Bukvic نويسنده Department of Dermatovenereology, University Hospital
Center Zagreb and School of Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb,
Croatia
Abstract :
Context The approval of topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) has
been a significant breakthrough for the treatment of atopic dermatitis
due to much lower systemic absorption and not causing skin atrophy even
after long-term use that have made them become popular replacements for
topical corticosteroids being almost equally effective. In January 2006,
the US food and drug administration (FDA), followed later also by the
European medicine agency (EMEA), issued the “black box” warning causing
controversy regarding a potential increased risk of lymphoma in patients
with atopic dermatitis and treated with TCIs. Evidence Acquisition
PubMed and MEDLINE® databases were systematically
searched utilizing a variety of terms relating to the subject matter.
Articles written only in English over the past 15 years were analyzed
and selected for review. Results So far, no scientific evidence of the
association has been found between use of TCIs, and increased incidence
of skin cancers and lymphomas in patients with AD. The systematic review
and meta-analysis by Legendre et al. found the role of TCIs unlikely to
be a significant risk factor of lymphoma in those patients. Conclusions
Despite an extensive body of evidence regarding the TCIs safety, the box
warning still remains leaving the physicians and patients unduly
uncertain and confused about the safety of TCI use.