Author/Authors :
Gholipour Abolfazl نويسنده , Abiri Ramin نويسنده , Alvandi Amirhooshang نويسنده Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran , Pajavand Hamid نويسنده Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran , azizi mohsen نويسنده , Bagherabadi Shahram نويسنده Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah
University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran , Kashef Mahsa نويسنده Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah
University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran , Hasanvand Banafsheh نويسنده Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah
University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, IR Iran
Abstract :
Background There should be a public environmental reservoir for
Helicobacter pylori in the developing countries, such
as Iran, due to their high infection rate of over 70%. Epidemiological
findings revealed that water could be a possible source of H.
pylori transmission. However, high prevalence of H.
pylori in drinking water in Kermanshah, West of Iran, was
detected in the authors’ previously published study. The current study
aims at designing a more accurate and rapid procedure to investigate the
prevalence of Helicobacter species and
cagA gene in drinking water samples in Kermanshah,
from October to December 2012. Methods In the current study, 60 tap
water samples were obtained and specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
targeted cagA and 16s rRNA was
performed. A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) targeted
ureC gene was developed to accurately detect
H. pylori in water samples. Results The prevalence of
ureC by PCR, ureC by LAMP and
16s rRNA by PCR were 26.67%, 38%, and 61.67%,
respectively. Among 24 samples (40%), 1 of the 2 tests was positive. The
prevalence of cagA gene among ureC
positive, 16s rRNA positive and all samples were
18.75%, 13.51%, and 10%, respectively. Conclusions Helicobacter
pylori contamination in drinking water was considerably higher
using LAMP compared with PCR. It is noteworthy that some H.
pylori positive samples were also positive for
Caga.