Author/Authors :
Lambert Lukas نويسنده Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine,
Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic , Lambertova Alena نويسنده Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine,
Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic , Danes Jan نويسنده Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine,
Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic , Grusova Gabriela نويسنده Fourth department of Internal Medicine, First Faculty of
Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech
Republic
Abstract :
Background Several dedicated computed tomography (CT) colonography
phantoms have been described previously. Objectives To compare their
pros and cons and describe the construction of a dedicated phantom that
can be easily manufactured. Materials and Methods We found 15 different
phantom designs by literature search and compared their advantages and
disadvantages based on their description and images. We tested various
materials for density and mechanical properties and constructed a
phantom from polypropylene pipes (30 mm and 50 mm in diameter, 52 cm in
length). Haustral folds were created by heat shaping and 39 intermediate
sessile polyps with a target size of 6-10 mm and two flat lesions were
created from silicone. Nine polyps were attached to a fold. The model
was placed in a 30-cm barrel filled with water to simulate attenuation
of human body. Attenuation of polyps was compared to intermediate polyps
found in patients. Results None of the earlier colonic phantoms found in
the literature incorporated all the properties that would ensure both
reproducibility and validity of the model (including a rigid wall,
density of the wall and polyps similar to human colon, at least two
levels of distension and durability). In the present phantom, the
average size of sessile polyps was 8.6 ± 0.9 mm and their density was 53
± 24 HU. We found no significant difference in polyp density between
simulated polyps in the phantom and polyps in human subjects (P = 0.70).
All polyps, with the exception of one flat lesion, were detected by
computer aided detection. Conclusion We constructed and validated a CT
colonography phantom with correct density allowing performance of
reproducible experiments.