Author/Authors :
Shohrati Majid نويسنده Chemical Injuries Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Najafian Bita نويسنده Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Khosravi Mohammad Hossein نويسنده Students’ Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Setayesh Forough نويسنده Student Research Committee (SRC), Baqiyatallah University
of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is one of the most
common respiratory disorders among premature infants. Despite recent
developments in the application of corticosteroids for preventing RDS,
their superiority and possible complications have remained
controversial. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, infants with
confirmed diagnosis of RDS were randomly allocated into 2 groups. The
first group underwent treatment with intravenous dexamethasone (0.15
mg/kg every 12 hours), and the second group received NAC nebulizer (400
mg every 8 hours) as well as intravenous dexamethasone for 3 to 5 days.
Treatment duration, disease and drug complications, number of received
doses as well as response to treatment (based on oxygen dependency and
need for reintubation), and mortality rates were recorded in a
checklist. Results Finally we evaluated 60 (33 males and 27 females)
infants in 2 dexamethasone and N-Acetyl Cysteine groups. Mean arterial
oxygen saturation was 88.70% ± 4.31% in NAC and 87.90% ± 5.96% in
dexamethasone group before intervention (P = 0.553). In the fifth day of
the intervention, the mean arterial oxygen saturation was 93.80 ± 3.86
in NAC and 93.4% ± 3.79% in dexamethasone group (P = 0.321). Prior to
the intervention, infants in NAC group had a mean respiratory rate (RR)
of 66.33 ± 8.33, and this was 65 ± 12.66 in infants in dexamethasone
group (P = 0.656). In the fifth day of intervention, infants had a mean
RR of 46.67 ± 9.21 in NAC and 49 ± 12.66 in dexamethasone groups (P =
0.454). Conclusions No significant difference was obtained between
intravenous dexamethasone alone and intravenous dexamethasone with
N-Acetyl cysteine nebulizer in the treatment of infantile respiratory
distress syndrome. However, a significant response to treatment was
observed in both groups.