Author/Authors :
Gohari Moghadam Keivan نويسنده Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ebrahimpur Mahbube نويسنده Department of Internal Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Pejman Sani Mahnaz نويسنده Department of Internal Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Naderpour Zeinab نويسنده Department of Internal Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Abstract :
Background Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a major problem in
hospitalized patients. There is discrepancy between healthcare
providers’ knowledge and their clinical practice regarding DVT
prophylaxis. In this study we aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitude and
practices of internal medicine residents at an educational hospital in
Tehran. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted during December
2015 at Shariati hospital of Tehran, IRAN. A questionnaire covering five
domains of clinical scenarios, adherence to guidelines, personal
beliefs, practice, preferences and personal beliefs, was distributed
between internal medicine residents. Medical records of patients at the
internal ward were reviewed to assess the status of DVT prophylaxis in
patients, who needed DVT prophylaxis based on American college of chest
physicians’ (ACCP) guidelines. Results Overall, 71 residents out of 88
residents returned the questionnaire, and 43.7% were aware of the
guidelines. Furthermore, 97.2% thought DVT prophylaxis is clinically
important but only 66.90% of the patients, who needed DVT prophylaxis,
were receiving DVT prophylaxis. More than 50% of the residents
underestimated the incidence of DVT and mortality rate due to pulmonary
embolism. The most common reason for not prescribing DVT prophylaxis was
concern about bleeding in 53.5% of the participants. Further analysis of
different components of the questionnaire showed that there is a
significant association between “awareness” and “adherence” scores (P =
0.041) and correct answers to “clinical scenarios” and “practice” (P =
0.012). Conclusions Although the level of knowledge on these clinical
situations is good, underestimation of the risk of DVT development in
hospitalized patients needs more attention. This might be due to low
levels of awareness of presence and content of DVT prophylaxis
guidelines. Programs should be designed to uphold the levels of
information of DVT prophylaxis guidelines among internal medicine
residents.