Author/Authors :
Kordi Ramin نويسنده , Noormohammadpour Pardis نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of
Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Mansournia Mohammad Ali نويسنده School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran , Linek Paweł نويسنده Department of Kinesitherapy and Special Methods in Physiotherapy, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland , Borna Sima نويسنده Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute,
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No 7, Al-e Ahmad St., Tehran,
IR Iran
Abstract :
Background It has been suggested that weakness and asymmetry of
core stabilizing muscles have an important role in the development of
scoliosis and its complications, especially low back pain. However there
is insufficient data comparing symmetry and function of these muscles in
scoliotic patients with the normal population. Also there are only a few
studies assessing the relationship between the degree of spinal
deviation and asymmetry of core stabilizing muscles. This study
evaluates the thickness, symmetry, and activation of the external
oblique (EO), the internal oblique (IO) and the transversus abdominis
(TrA) muscles of patients with AIS and compares these data with a group
of normal adolescents. Objectives The objective of this observational
study was to know the asymmetry pattern of lateral abdominal muscles at
rest and during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADiM) in adolescents
with idiopathic scoliosis and to compare it with a group of healthy
adolescents. Methods Twenty healthy adolescents and twenty patients with
AIS, aged 10 to 18 years, were included. The thickness of lateral
abdominal muscles was measured, using ultrasound, at the end of normal
exhalation at rest and during the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADiM).
Muscular activity was represented as absolute difference and percentage
change in the muscle thickness during the ADiM compared with rest.
Results There was no side to side asymmetry in muscle thickness at rest
and also during ADiM in two groups. Thickness of right EO [0.39 (0.09)
in the AIS group compared to 0.51 (0.12) in the normal group] and left
EO [0.38(0.10) in the AIS group compared to 0.50 (0.11) in the normal
group] at rest was higher in the normal group (P < 0.05). The
activity of right and left EO was higher in AIS group (P < 0.05).
There was a positive correlation between the lumbar Cobb’s angle with
the right and the right-to-left difference of TrA thickness during the
ADiM (P < 0.05). In other words, the more the lumbar Cobb’s angle
to the right, the thicker the right TrA relative to the left TrA during
the ADiM. Conclusions The EO muscle was thinner and had higher activity
during ADiM in the AIS group. Analysis of our data showed that in the
AIS group the higher the lumbar spinal curve to the right, the thicker
the right TrA compared to the left TrA.