Author/Authors :
Firouzi Masoumeh نويسنده Department of Biochemistry, Institute of biochemistry and biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Firouzi Masoumeh , Abdollah Zadegan Shayan نويسنده Research Center for Neural Repair (RCNR), Animal
Laboratory Department, University of Tehran, Tehran, IR
Iran , Kamrani Reza Shahryar نويسنده Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Shariati
Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR
Iran , Erfanian Reza نويسنده Research Center for Neural Repair (RCNR), University of
Tehran, Tehran, Iran , Hossein Nabian Mohammad نويسنده Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Shariati
Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran , Zanjani Leila Oriady نويسنده Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Shariati
Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran,
Iran
Abstract :
Background Nerve repair with microsurgical techniques is the gold
standard and the most widely used surgical treatment for nerve
reconstruction. However, the optimum number of microsutures for
approximation of nerve ends has not been investigated thoroughly, as the
focus of previous studies has been on in vitro examination of
biomechanical strength of the repaired nerve. Objectives In this study,
we investigated the effect of the number of suture on nerve repair,
concerning mechanical, functional, and morphometric aspects. Methods
Twenty-four male Wistar rats were subjected to tibial nerve transection
and randomly divided into three groups: control with no repair; repair
with 1 suture; and repair with 3 sutures. Tibial functional index (TFI)
was determined weekly for two months to assess the functional recovery.
At the end of the study, macroscopic and microscopic evaluations as well
as adhesive strength quantification at the site of the injury were
performed. Results There was no significant difference in the TFI
measures between 1-suture and 3-suture groups during 8 weeks (P >
0.05). Adhesive strength was not significantly different between three
groups (P > 0.05); however, it was higher in both suture groups
compared with the control group. Scar index was 0.50 (SD = 0.06, n = 2)
in control, 0.54 (SD = 0.08, n = 4) in 1-suture, and 0.58 (SD = 0.13, n
= 4) in 3-suture groups. The comparison of the mean of differences in
scar index and vascular index did not imply significant differences (P
> 0.05). Conclusions Repair of rat’s tibial nerve with one or
three microsutures gave comparable outcomes. This may suggest that for
functional recovery of the fine nerves, simple approximation with
minimum number of sutures is sufficient.