Author/Authors :
Samadi Miandoab P. نويسنده Medical Radiation Group - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering - Graduate University of Advanced Technology , Esmaili Torshabi A. نويسنده Medical Radiation Group - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering - Graduate University of Advanced Technology , Nankali S. نويسنده Medical Radiation Group - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering - Graduate University of Advanced Technology
Abstract :
Background: Since tumors located in thorax region of body mainly move due to
respiration, in the modern radiotherapy, there have been many attempts such as; external
markers, strain gage and spirometer represent for monitoring patients’ breathing
signal. With the advent of fluoroscopy technique, indirect methods were proposed as
an alternative approach to extract patients’ breathing signals.
Materials and Methods: The purpose of this study is to extract respiratory
signals using two available methods based on clustering and intensity strategies on
medical image dataset of XCAT phantom.
Results: For testing and evaluation methods, correlation coefficient, standard division,
amplitude ratio and different phases are utilized. Phantom study showed excellent
match between correlation coefficient, standard division, amplitude ratio and
different phase. Both techniques segmenting medical images are robust due to their
inherent mathematical properties. Using clustering strategy, lung region borders are remarkably
extracted regarding intensity-based method. This may also affect the amount
of amplitude signal.
Conclusion: To evaluate the performance of these methods, results are compared
with slice body volume (SBV) method. Moreover, all methods have shown the same
correlation coefficient of 99%, but at different amplitude ratio and different phase. In
SBV method, standard division and different phase are better than clustering and intensity
methods with SDR=4.71 mm, and SDL=4.12 mm and average different phase
1.47 %, but amplitude ration of clustering method is significantly more remarkable
than SBV and intensity methods.