Author/Authors :
Rahimi, Changiz Department of Clinical Psychology - Shiraz University - Shiraz , Haghighi, Mahbobeh Department of Clinical Psychology - Shiraz University - Shiraz
Abstract :
Background: Obsessive patients are distressed by intrusive
thoughts, which are related to unreal threats. These patients
feel that they are responsible for harming themselves and others.
While controlling worry and meta-cognitive beliefs, the
present study aimed at comparing the responsibility attitudes
in obsessive compulsive patients with those in normal subjects
to determine whether the difference in responsibility attitudes
between two groups was significant.
Methods: A group of 15 patients were compared with normal
subjects (n=15) who matched the patient group in terms of
gender, age and education. All subjects filled the Responsibility
Attitude Scale, the Penn, State Worry Questionnaire and
the Meta-cognition Questionnaire -30. The findings were analyzed
using descriptive statistics as well as student t and ANCOVA
tests.
Results: Responsibility attitudes in obsessive patients were
significantly higher than those in normal subjects (P<0.001),
when patient worries and meta-cognitive beliefs were not
controlled. However, after controlling patient's worry and
meta-cognitive beliefs there was no significant difference
between responsibility attitudes in normal and obsessive–
compulsive group.
Conclusion: The findings might suggest that responsibility
attitude is not strongly related to obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
It seems that it is a characteristic caused by basic metacognitive
beliefs, because the relationship between the responsibility
and the symptoms was dependent on meta-cognition.
Therefore, in studying the etiology and treatment of obsessive
compulsive disorders focus on the responsibility attitudes
alone cannot be very helpful.