Title of article
Low diagnostic values of ultrasonography and negative appendectomy: still a major problem in university hospitals
Author/Authors
Azizi, Rasoul Gastrointestinal & Liver Disease Research Center - Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Farsi, Negin Gastrointestinal & Liver Disease Research Center - Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Motevasseli, Tahmineh Gastrointestinal & Liver Disease Research Center - Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Fereshtehnejad, Mohammad Gastrointestinal & Liver Disease Research Center - Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Khatami, Abdoreza Gastrointestinal & Liver Disease Research Center - Firoozgar Clinical Research Development Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Pages
8
From page
200
To page
207
Abstract
Background: Misdiagnosis of the acute appendicitis may increase the rate of negative
appendectomies, which involve a huge waste of resources and are sometimes
associated with severe complications. Furthermore, false negative result of ultrasonography
(US) could lead to perforation of appendix. Since ultrasonography is still
the most common imaging technique used in Iranian appendicitis patients, the study focused
on evaluate the accuracy of ultrasonograghy in an educational hospital in Iran.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of ultrasonograghy in 270 patients
who referred to Rasoul-e-Akram hospital in Tehran, Iran, between April 2002
and October 2004 with acute abdominal symptoms suggestive of appendicitis. The
results of ultrasonography were compared with the histopathologic reports of biopsies
as a gold standard. In data analysis Chi-square, independent t-test and Mann-
Whitney U-test were performed.
Results: The accuracy of ultrasonograghy in acute appendicitis was 60.4% and
the rate of negative appendectomy was 17.4%. Diagnostic values of US were calculated
as the sensitivity of 55.4% [95% confidence interval (CI)=48.6-62], specificity
of 72.3% (95%CI=57.1-83.9), positive predictable value (PPV) of 90.4% (95%CI=
83.9-94.6) and negative predictable value (NPV) 25.6% (95%CI=18.6-34).
Conclusion: Although the results of our study implied that the diagnostic values
of ultrasonography were not considerable, but it is still the only imaging techniques
available for patients in Iran. In reference to the low NPV, using an alternative technique
such as abdominal CT scan is recommended. More attention must be paid on
the signs and symptoms related to acute appendicitis in such patients especially in
teaching hospitals.
Keywords
accuracy , diagnostic value , ultrasonography , Acute appendicitis
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2011
Record number
2417166
Link To Document