Author/Authors :
Sedghi, Shahram Department of Librarianship and Medical Information - School of Health Management and Information Sciences - and Health Management and Economics Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Abdolahi, Nida Faculty Member - Farhangian University, Sanandaj, Kurdistan, Iran , Azimi, Ali Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences - Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashahd, Iran , Tahamtan, Iman Faculty member of Librarianship and Medical Information - Health Information Management Research Centre - Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran , Abdollahi, Leila MSc in Librarianship and Medical Information - Central Library - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Personal Information Management (PIM) refers to the tools and activities to save and
retrieve personal information for future uses. This study examined the PIM activities of faculty
members of Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) regarding their preferred PIM tools and
four aspects of acquiring, organizing, storing and retrieving personal information.
Methods: The qualitative design was based on phenomenology approach and we carried out 37
interviews with clinical and basic sciences faculty members of IUMS in 2014. The participants were
selected using a random sampling method. All interviews were recorded by a digital voice recorder,
and then transcribed, codified and finally analyzed using NVivo 8 software.
Results: The use of PIM electronic tools (e-tools) was below expectation among the studied sample
and just 37% had reasonable knowledge of PIM e-tools such as, external hard drivers, flash memories
etc. However, all participants used both paper and electronic devices to store and access information.
Internal mass memories (in Laptops) and flash memories were the most used e-tools to save
information. Most participants used “subject” (41.00%) and “file name” (33.7 %) to save, organize
and retrieve their stored information. Most users preferred paper-based rather than electronic tools to
keep their personal information.
Conclusion: Faculty members had little knowledge about PIM techniques and tools. Those who
organized personal information could easier retrieve the stored information for future uses. Enhancing
familiarity with PIM tools and training courses of PIM tools and techniques are suggested.
Keywords :
Iran , Faculty , Literacy , Storage and retrieval , Information seeking behavior , Information Management