Author/Authors :
Yassin, Marzieh Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Talebian, Saeed Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ebrahimi Takamjani, Ismail Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Maroufi, Nader Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ahmadi, Amir Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sarrafzadeh, Javad Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Emrani, Anita Physical Therapy Department - Rehabilitation Faculty - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Myofascial pain syndrome is a significant source of mechanical pain. The aim of this
study was to investigate the effects of arm movement on reaction time in females with latent and
active upper trapezius myofascial trigger point.
Methods: In this interventional study, a convenience sample of fifteen women with one active
MTP, fifteen women with one latent MTP in the upper trapezius, and fifteen normal healthy women
were participated. Participants were asked to stand for 10 seconds in an erect standing position. Muscle
reaction times were recorded including anterior deltoid (AD), cervical paraspinal (CP) lumbar
paraspinal (LP), both of upper trapezius (UT), sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and medial head of gastrocnemius
(GcM). Participants were asked to flex their arms in response to a sound stimulus preceded
by a warning sound stimulus. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Test.
Results: There was significant differences in motor time and reaction time between active and control
groups (p< 0.05) except for GcM. There was no significant difference in motor time between
active and passive groups except for UT without MTP and SCM (p< 0.05). Also, there were no significant
differences in motor times between latent MTP and control groups. Furthermore, there was
no significant difference in premotor times between the three groups.
Conclusion: The present study shows that patients with active MTP need more time to react to
stimulus, but patients with latent MTP are similar to healthy subjects in the reaction time. Patients
with active MTP had less compatibility with environmental stimulations, and they responded to a
specific stimulation with variability in Surface Electromyography (SEMG).