Author/Authors :
Ganji, Azita Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Esmaeilzadeh, Abbas Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Ghanaei, Omid Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Saberi, Amin Student Research Committee - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Taherzadeh, Danial Biochemistry & Nutrition Research Center - Department of Biochemistry - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Sazgarnia, Soodabe Student Research Committee - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad Azad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Mayabi Joghal, Zohre Student Research Committee - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad Azad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Zirak, Mahboube Student Research Committee - Faculty of Medicine - Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran , AbdolahRamazani, Salman Department of Medicinal Chemistry - School of Pharmacy - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Zarifmahmoudi, Leili Nuclear Medicine Research Center - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a quantitative measure of variability in the size of circulating erythrocytes.
It has been recently identified as a prognostic marker in several diseases including acute pancreatitis (AP). In this systematic
review the prognostic value of RDW in predicting mortality of AP patients will be assessed.
Methods: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and ISI databases were searched until September 2016 using the following search strategy:
(pancreatitis or pancreatitides) and (RDW or "red cell distribution width" or "red blood cell distribution width" or anisocytosis).
Four authors independently reviewed the retrieved articles. Studies were included if they had evaluated the association between RDW
value and mortality of acute pancreatitis patients. Case reports, comments, letters to the editor, reviews, study protocols, and experimental
studies were not included. Data abstraction and quality assessment for the included studies was independently performed by
two authors. Quality of studies was assessed using Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine checklist for prognostic studies. Data
were synthesized qualitatively, and a meta-analysis was performed on the diagnostic performance of RDW to predict mortality in AP
patients.
Results: Seven studies (976 patients) were included in the systematic review. Six studies reported a statistically significant association
between RDW value and mortality. Meta-analysis was performed on four studies (487 patients) using a bivariate model and a
summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was plotted with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.757. The pooled diagnostic
odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity and specificity was 19.51 (95% CI: 5.26-72.30), 67% (95% CI: 51%-80%) and 90% (95% CI:
73%-96%), respectively.
Conclusion: RDW is an easy to use and an inexpensive marker with a moderate prognostic value to predict death in AP patients.
Clinicians should be more alert when a patient with AP has an increased RDW. Investigation of possible combinations of other prognostic
markers with RDW is recommended.
Keywords :
Meta-analysis , Systematic review , Mortality , Prognosis , Acute pancreatitis , Red blood cell distribution width