Author/Authors :
Mustapa Sadi, Mursilalaili Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws - International Islamic University Malaysia - Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia , Kamarudin, Abdul Rani Department of Legal Practice - Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyah of Laws - International Islamic University Malaysia , Mohamed, Duryana Department of Legal Practice - Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyah of Laws - International Islamic University Malaysia , Ramlee, Zulfakar Department of Legal Practice - Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyah of Laws - International Islamic University Malaysia
Abstract :
Electronic evidence is one of the many forms of documentary evidence. It is stored and
retrievable from electronic devices such as computers and smartphones, particularly in
the their hard disks or memory banks. However, due to the fragile nature of electronic
evidences, it is prone or susceptible to damage or alteration, as well as destruction due to
improper handling or safe keeping. Since it can easily be tampered with or self-deteriorate,
establishing the authenticity and reliability of electronic evidence is a technical task.
Meanwhile, states of affairs would cause such electronic evidence to be inadmissible or
carries low or no weightage whatsoever by the court, thus undermining the prosecution’s
or the plaintiff’s case, as the case may be. In order to ensure such evidence is admissible
and carry the expected weightage, relevant parties must first prove the authenticity of such
evidence and subsequently on its reliability and relevancy. Nevertheless, in cybercrime
cases, proving the crime is actually a technical challenge, where the responsible personnel
are required to understand what is electronic evidence, how to extract and preserve the
originality of such evidence and the laws governing electronic evidence, as well as
cybercrimes. This article attempts to explain the scope of electronic evidence in relation
to criminal cases such as in cybercrimes, as far as its admissibility and weightage are
concerned. The discussion will be based on Malaysian and common laws.