Author/Authors :
Kazemi, Ashraf Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Ehsanpour, Soheila Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center - School of Nursing and Midwifery - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
BACKGROUND: The aim of training midwifery student is to increase scientific and practical abilities in trainees in order to
present caring health services. Then, the evaluation tools of these abilities have great importance. This study tried to evaluate
the content validity, criterion validity and base validity of academic exams.
METHODS: This cross-sectional research was an evaluated type that has been done on 18 special theoretical courses of
midwifery in 2 semesters in 2007-2008. The data gathered by checklists. The data about questionnaire and the result of
analyzing exam questions (final and midterm) were compiled by 2 educating experts of medical education and 2 experts
for each course. The data analyzed by SPSS software. For determining the base validity, spearman correlation test and for
presenting descriptive results, distribution tables were applied.
RESULTS: The evaluation of 1013 questions showed that in 18 courses, in 61.18% of exams, more than 90% of questions
had content validity and in 28.27% of exams, in more than 90% of questions, criterion validity had been considered. The
results showed that in 92.38% of questions, content validity and in 80.45% of questions, criterion validity was considered.
11 courses out of 18 courses had base validity.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that content validity of the exam questions in midwifery special theoretical courses
was in favorable levels. But, the criterion validity of exam questions was far away from the ideal level. Then, education in
each session can help the teachers achieve their exam purposes.
Keywords :
Content validity , criterion validity , midwifery special exams , reliability